STUNNING, JUST STUNNING

The party that gave us K Street; now has some of those same nefarious characters involved in its presidential campaign.

K Street was an unprecedented campaign to get rid of one of the parties in our alleged two party system. As I remember it, corporations that donated to Democrats were to be punished for their “errors” of judgement. This contempt for democracy is said to be back in the ranks of the bumbling but can not be blamed John McCain’s bid for Bushes third term.

While McCain’s main critique of the presumed Democratic nominee Barack Obama, is that he is naive and inexperienced, why is someone so experienced as John McCain, hiring on such highly questionable characters, many involved with foreign governments and lobbies that would quite possibly compromise foreign policy decisions to be? He does not need to answer that further, since he just announced that no one on his staff is to be a lobbyist. But since it was his style or choice so far, what has actually changed? What promise is there for the future? I know. Take his word on it. He suddenly changed again. Get over it. But Barack is responsible for what his ex preacher said, and his wife’s comments taken out of context? Both of those seem inherently less important to the nations interest.

America, the USA, has just endured a group of predatory opportunist who viewed the great American commons as their own feeding ground. Will Bushes third term holder now be beholding to all the compromised characters he seems to keep surrounding himself with? Will America fall victim again to fear and jingoism wrapped up in their security blankets of blind trust of “conservatives” who thrive off of perpetuating insecurities?

You know where help us if these shysters get back into the drivers seat once again. We and the world may not be able to contain their drunken driving skills.

THE BARACK OBAMA AND JERIMIAH WRIGHT exchange=+or-?

Barack’s biggest problem seemed to have become the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. The connection was seeming to have been built up into a possible downer for Obama in the future. It seems to be producing negative results as most conflicts do. The resulting schism seems to have possibly removed the future connection as a viable ammo stash. The days events may have in ways been orchestrated. Lot’s of possible seems.

These facts remain; super delegates are still only trickling in, more to Obama than Clinton since Pennsylvania. This time in the campaign may become a moment where Barack’s shoes were soiled, and with the aid of the Rev. Wright, were made good to go into the election.

It remains to be seen if the hidden prominent subtext of interracial misgivings, will come to be a most deciding factor for a significant segment of the population. Not that male and female will not also become a similar, unspoken factor for some in the booth, if traditional rolls become a reactionary guide.

During political contest; what seems obvious might be the desired result, but not a benefit to whom it first seems. Meaning; in time, a seeming negative of the moment may become a historical positive for someone, thus not the result it at first seems to be. (I have restated my original sentence in the post since it led to too many loops open to those not following my chain of thought. Thanks for your feedback, and I hope you are not even more lost after this “correction”.)